Some questions answered

Cambridge Connections remains an important issue for the Cambridge community and as a board we continue to advocate strongly for a comprehensive approach to implementation of the transport strategy, including the eventual provision of a third river crossing.

Jo Davies-Colley

We also acknowledge the significance of community engagement needed for this type of project, and after engaging closely with the community, we are confident that the process has been inadequate, resulting in high levels of frustration and concern from residents.

We are pleased that the feedback date was extended for a month and the bridge location is ‘off the table’.

Over the last two months we have heard from our community that more information is needed before they can give feedback.   I asked the transportation team if they could provide some answers to the three most common questions we are hearing.

  1. Can the Victoria Bridge be added on to, so more traffic can cross the river instead of a new bridge? While it is possible to strengthen the 117-year-old bridge to take more traffic, it would be complex and it would significantly alter the bridge. The bridge has heritage recognition as a Category 1 historic place, meaning it should be kept close to its original design. There may be options to keep the bridge partly open to traffic, but ideally, we will not rely on it as an essential traffic link.
  2. What about on and off ramps? Why can’t some be built around the golf course, taking people straight to Hamilton instead of going through Cambridge? This option was considered, but modelling showed only a small number of motorists would use it because it is a significantly longer route. Modelling showed most drivers would prefer to take the existing route through town to the expressway.
  3. Could this project end up on the government’s fast track system and not need public consultation at all? A bridge which is needed in 20-plus years does not appear to fit the legislation of needing to be fast tracked. We have time to examine the options, complete detailed investigations, consult with the community and find a solution that meets the transport needs of our community in the long term.
  4. Where to from here? The independent review into the development of the business case and the community engagement to date will be an important step to reset the project as we look towards the next steps. While no firm timeframe can be put on the completion of the review, the results would be shared with the community once the outcomes had been considered.

The board continues to engage with the community at every opportunity and thank those who have communicated their thoughts and opinions to us.

As always, we welcome any member of the community to email us or attend and present on any topic at our public forum.

More Recent News

History against waste plant

Concerns Global Contracting Solutions may not comply with council rules, has Fonterra objecting to plans for a waste to energy plant in Racecourse Road, Te Awamutu. In its submission to an Environmental Protection Agency board…

Course plotted for maunga

Orienteering Waikato members have found a way to support Sanctuary Mountain Maungatautari with a Save the Sanctuary Rogaine. When the club heard the Department of Conservation had withdrawn operational funding from the Maungatautari Ecological Island…

Village grows

Capacity at Cambridge Resthaven will continue to increase with plans set in motion for additional supported living apartments. A memorandum of understanding was signed last week by Cambridge Resthaven and Livingstone Building for the stage…

Plenty of helping hands

Card sharks emerged from their summer hiatus last week to enjoy the start of the new Cambridge Bridge Club year. With a barbecue meal behind them, some 60 club members filled 15 tables for the…