Some questions answered

Cambridge Connections remains an important issue for the Cambridge community and as a board we continue to advocate strongly for a comprehensive approach to implementation of the transport strategy, including the eventual provision of a third river crossing.

Jo Davies-Colley

We also acknowledge the significance of community engagement needed for this type of project, and after engaging closely with the community, we are confident that the process has been inadequate, resulting in high levels of frustration and concern from residents.

We are pleased that the feedback date was extended for a month and the bridge location is ‘off the table’.

Over the last two months we have heard from our community that more information is needed before they can give feedback.   I asked the transportation team if they could provide some answers to the three most common questions we are hearing.

  1. Can the Victoria Bridge be added on to, so more traffic can cross the river instead of a new bridge? While it is possible to strengthen the 117-year-old bridge to take more traffic, it would be complex and it would significantly alter the bridge. The bridge has heritage recognition as a Category 1 historic place, meaning it should be kept close to its original design. There may be options to keep the bridge partly open to traffic, but ideally, we will not rely on it as an essential traffic link.
  2. What about on and off ramps? Why can’t some be built around the golf course, taking people straight to Hamilton instead of going through Cambridge? This option was considered, but modelling showed only a small number of motorists would use it because it is a significantly longer route. Modelling showed most drivers would prefer to take the existing route through town to the expressway.
  3. Could this project end up on the government’s fast track system and not need public consultation at all? A bridge which is needed in 20-plus years does not appear to fit the legislation of needing to be fast tracked. We have time to examine the options, complete detailed investigations, consult with the community and find a solution that meets the transport needs of our community in the long term.
  4. Where to from here? The independent review into the development of the business case and the community engagement to date will be an important step to reset the project as we look towards the next steps. While no firm timeframe can be put on the completion of the review, the results would be shared with the community once the outcomes had been considered.

The board continues to engage with the community at every opportunity and thank those who have communicated their thoughts and opinions to us.

As always, we welcome any member of the community to email us or attend and present on any topic at our public forum.

More Recent News

Montgomerie tops councillor salaries

Update February 22, 12pm Cambridge ward member Roger Gordon remains the lowest paid elected councillor following mayor Susan O’Regan’s decision to change committee membership while Mike Montgomerie is now the highest paid councillor – ahead…

Financial boost for Sanctuary Mountain

The government has provided a one-off funding injection of $750,000 over three years to the Maungatautari Ecological Island Trust Sanctuary. The Sanctuary – a popular tourist destination in the Waikato region – is home to native…

Fluoride bill welcomed

Antifluoride campaigner and local body politician Kane Titchener is celebrating New Zealand First’s call for a referendum to review the move to put decisions over fluoride into the Ministry of Health’s court. Winston Peters accepted…

Farmers wait for plan change ruling

Farmers have only weeks to wait to learn the extent of a Waikato Regional Council water quality plan change on their operations. As they wait for the final version of Plan Change One to fall…